Read All About It! Newspapers Lose Web War

How about "The Educational Potential of Googlewhacking" from WeblogsInEducation.

Both Metafilter and Geeklife touched on Googlewhacking.

Internet.com reviewed Googlewhacking.

If you're wondering why I'm experiencing so much traffic today, blame Google. Do a search for Googlewhack. See me there as #2 and #3? If you click on my link you won't be the first one today. Infact, according to my incomplete stats for the day you won't even be 586th person to do so.

Ken Hagler directed me to this piece comparing Enron's way of doing business to how the Social Security Administration does its.

StupidTom writes, "I am now seriously rethinking the formation of my mentally challenged party. This whole movement is based on my theory that nobody messes with a mental patient... If Perot had made it into the big chair just saying you were American would have caused people from other countries to flinch. I would just sleep better with a nut at the switch..."

FALSE: A groom was suffocated by a stripper's massive breasts. Although it was reported in Yahoo article, do you see all those links to the Weekly World News? That should be a giveaway.

News.com reviews Googlewhacking: "What do you get when you cross a colonoscopy with a cockatiel? The same thing you get when you cross a cartographer with a hairball--a Googlewhack."

Gregor, I agree that the Radio system for publishing weblogs is the best. (I do use Radio, after all.) I like that the content exsists in two places at once -- here on my desktop and somewhere else. Unlike weblogging from a central server (like Blogger) or from your own server (like Greymatter), Radio allows you to keep control of your data. Unfortunately, as demonstrated today, by hosting your weblog on a centralized server you're always at the whim of that server. I wish there was an easy way we that we could all host on our servers. Dave has his Qube. "It sits on the desk, behind all the honkers, and just serves pages." When we all get always-on high speed wireless connections, maybe we'll just carry our servers around in our pockets. (Unfortunately, then the data would only be in one place -- with us. Not good in accidents. Maybe we could mirror our sites on other people's personal servers. But this is discussion for the future.) When we all get always-on high speed wireless connections, maybe we'll just carry our servers around in our pockets. (Unfortunately, then the data would only be in one place -- with us. Not good in accidents. Maybe we could mirror our sites on other people's personal servers. But this is discussion for the future.)